• Key Facts About Our Services
  • Legal Notices
  • Terms & Conditions
Home
  • Home
  • Biographies
  • Tools, Processes and Talents
  • Property Search
  • Borrow it
  • Protect it
  • Wills, Trusts and Estate Planning
  • Corporate Assurance and Structure
  • Foreign Currency - direct access to the traders
  • Warrens' Guitar
  • Bank of England
  • Northern Rock UKSA Campaign
  • Charity
  • Contact us
Home

Fixed rates UP, Tracker margins DOWN, Deposit requirements still HIGH – but why?

  • 7th August 2009

    Key factors dictating mortgage lenders ability to lend are risk, cost of borrowing and the regulatory framework. They are keen to demonstrate to their critics and the regulators that they are lending sensibly and responsibly once again. They are also keen to demonstrate to their shareholders that they are a safe bank and loans are provided only against adequate security.

    The facts are:
    - Lending secured against a perceived falling UK property market is considered risky.
    - Cost of borrowing [for the lenders] is at an all time low with the 3-month LIBOR at 0.8875% (as at 7th of August 2009).
    - Regulators dictate a disproportionate Capital Adequacy requirement in respect of lending provision.

    So why do we find such difficulties in obtaining mainstream mortgage lending at comparative rates when compared to cost of borrowing?

    One argument is that the lenders are taking in deposits from savers and funds from central banks to stockpile in their reserves to satisfy the Capital Adequacy requirements as laid down in the Basel II legislation.

    Another is that there are so few ‘active’ lenders in the UK mortgage market, they can call the shots on pricing, and maintain artificially high profit margins on the loans being made to reduce the impact of possible future losses.

    The truth would appear to be a bit of both. Detailed discussions with one mainstream lender, simplifies the issues.

    It would appear that a lender lending £150,000 on a property worth £200,000 (at 75% loan to value) will have to keep circa £300,000 ‘in the bank’ to satisfy the requirements and yet it would seem, the same £150,000 loan on a property worth £167,000 (at 90% loan to value) will have to retain £600,000 ‘in the bank’ to satisfy the requirements.

    In essence, the lender lending at 75% loan to value has to cover earnings on a total ‘commitment’ of £450,000, whereas, a lender lending at 90% has to cover earnings on £750,000 commitment using our example above, and the pricing of these products calculated accordingly.

    Pressure on lending is still high as more buyers filter into the market. The predictions for rate rises over the next 24 to 36 months brings higher fixed rate mortgage costs with many continuing to rise throughout July.

    Tracker margins have reduced slightly and are expected to continue to reduce but not as quickly as fixed rates are rising.

    Choice of mortgage product is very much wide open but the lenders available still limited and suffering from poor service standards and delays in processing mortgage applications.

    90% lending is still hard to obtain and remains at a high cost with many 90% products well into the late 6%'s. Higher deposits or levels of equity are still very much the order of the day.

  • The Clayton Hulme Partnership

    101a Lapwing Lane
    Didsbury
    Manchester
    M20 6UR

    Tel 0161 434 6016
    Fax 0161 434 8016
    Email
    Location Map

    News

    • HM Treasury - Stamp Duty Land Tax exemption limit increased (UPDATE 14th August 2009)
    • Nationwide Report - House Prices (31st July 2009)
    • Bank of England Rates remain at 0.5% (6th August 2009)
    • Fixed rates UP, Tracker margins DOWN, Deposit requirements still HIGH – but why?
    • Housing market - is it on a recovery? It would certainly appear so!!
    more
     
    • Key Facts About Our Services
    • Legal Notices
    • Terms & Conditions